A note about the extended usages of kke
Roxy — Laiqbun, Conlanging — 16/02/21 19:38 GMT-5
kke is a fun particle predicate. We know what it does in argument form in a content clause, but how it interacts with other forms and in other places is not documented. This is me musing about the repercussions of Laiqbun being Laiqbun.
Knowing that kke refers back to the root of its clause, we can assume that using it as a content clause will refer back to the predicate of the main clause, such that sheo kki sha dy would be just another way to say sheo shio sha dy. This is not that interesting, but I’m sure its fun to play with for artistic purposes.
Similarly, using it as an argument in the main clause would be the same as using the main clause’s predicate, so that sheo sha kka dy is…